Previously, when spectral band replication (SBR) or parametric
stereo (PS) was in use in an MPEG-4 stream, the channel configuration
chosen was likely incorrect. The channel configuration was *always*
incorrect for 7.1 audio (gave 7 channels instead of 8).
The sample data position is the sum of the data offset and the base data offset.
The base data offset is either specified in the stream, or defaults to the first
byte position in the moof box. (We only support one traf per moof currently, so
the offset does not need to be assigned for later track fragments.) The data
position can optionally be offset by a data position read from the trun.
The auxiliary information offset is calculated in the same way, but using an
offset read from the saio box.
Issue: #837
Issue: #861
Context:
- Currently, playback is significantly more juddery with it disabled,
particularly on AndroidTV.
- We should be able to do the "best" job of this internally, so injection
doesn't buy anything useful. If someone has a better implementation for
adjusting the frame release, they should improve the core library.
The only Samsung devices with names starting "d2" that we're aware of
are Galaxy S3 variants, and also one Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo d2aio
SAMSUNG-SGH-I747Z. This change speculatively includes that device too because
its name is very similar to SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 which is known to be affected.
Issue: #548
Try re-sync'ing to the next level 1 element when invalid data is found. This
corrects the behavior for test case 4 in the mkv test suite.
Partially Fixes Issue #631
This change keeps the proportion offset * 256 as a floating point value rather
than rounding it before linear interpolation, which will increase precision
slightly when seeking in streams with XING headers.
In practice, this won't make much of a difference because precise seeking in VBR
MP3s with XING headers seems not to be possible without reading the entire file,
due to the fact that the (uneven) distribution of bits is represented by a fixed
number of table of contents entries.
- The old approach was technically incorrect, because the checks
were "capacity < sampleSize" and hence neglected the fact that
the buffer position may be greater than 0 (e.g. if the caller
wants to prefix the sample with some additional data).
- Also proactively throw an exception if the buffer is too small,
rather than wait for the failure when we actually do the write.
